If you’re new to property, the terms freehold, 99-year, 999-year, and leasehold can be confusing. So let us break it down for you.
Freehold property can be held by the owner indefinitely. On the other hand, a 99-year leasehold property reverts back to the state upon the expiry of its lease.
A holdover from the colonial era is properties with 999-year leases. This is, for all intents and purposes, similar to freehold.
Note that in any case, there are provisions that allow the government to reclaim the land for vital infrastructure or security purposes. If your house is in the way of a major highway, the fact that it’s freehold is not going to save it. A case in point is the four-storey Thomson Road freehold property that’s been acquired to make way for the North-South Corridor.
There is also the possibility of en-bloc redevelopment. If a developer makes an en bloc attempt for your freehold condo, and the other residents agree to it, you’re still going to be moving out.
As a (very loose) rule of thumb, the initial sale price of a freehold unit (new sale) tends to be 10 to 15% higher compared to a leasehold unit in the same area.
Now that’s out of the way, let’s look at the never-ending dispute of prices.
Which is worth more, 99 years or freehold?
This question is not easy to answer as it’s difficult to isolate individual causes of property value. For example, a unit with 70 years left on its lease, but is located in the Central Business District (CBD), will probably still be worth more than a freehold unit on the outskirts of Punggol.
Likewise, if a freehold property is situated closer to an MRT station, it can be hard to tell how much of the higher valuation is due to its freehold nature, and how much is related to its accessibility.
Lease is just one of many factors affecting value, and its significance is hard to isolate.
It should come as no surprise that, for the past two to three decades, analysts and investors have been arguing about the price effects of leasehold versus freehold statuses. There are a few common conclusions that we can arrive at, however:
- Price differences occur at the 21- and 40-year mark
- In theory, freehold units fetch a better price during en bloc
- Leasehold is better for rental yields
- The advantage of freehold is more theoretical than practical
Price differences occur at the 21- and 40-year mark
As a rule of thumb, a new freehold unit will be priced at about 10% higher than a leasehold counterpart. However, leasehold units tend to show greater depreciation than leasehold properties at 21 years of age, and then 40 years of age. Before that point, it’s even possible that some leasehold properties will depreciate slower than their freehold counterparts.
In theory, freehold units fetch a better price during en bloc
The en bloc value of a freehold development should be higher, as the owners are giving up more. A leasehold unit near the end of its lease should be priced lower since in a few decades the owners could end up getting nothing from it. Or so goes the theory.
But if it worked that neatly, we could just compare the en bloc price of a freehold unit and a leasehold unit, and declare “Development X is cheaper because it is leasehold”. In reality, that would be a misleading comparison.
En bloc offers are affected by a range of factors, such as the state of the market, the zoning laws, and the amenities that have been built up. For example, if zoning laws dictate that a freehold development cannot be replaced by a condo of the same height (we believe this may be the case with Peace Mansions), then the en bloc price may be lower despite the condo being freehold.
Likewise, it is nearby amenities — such as the construction of train stations, malls, and schools — that developers factor into their en bloc bid. If the amenities around a freehold condo don’t improve substantially, that can still translate to a lower en bloc price.
Leasehold is better for rental yields
Leasehold units can be better for rental yields, by dint of simple mathematics. The rental yield is the annual rental income, divided by the total cost of the property. Lower cost, higher yield.
Also, bear in mind that rental income is unaffected by whether a condo is a freehold or leasehold. A tenant will not pay any less just because a condo is on a 99-year lease.
For example, say you buy a leasehold condo that’s S$1 million and generates S$3,000 a month in rent. This is a rental yield of 3.6%.
Now say you buy a freehold counterpart, in the same area, and it costs 15% more. That’s S$1,150,000. Now, will your rental income increase? Unlikely, as it does not matter to the tenant whether the condo is a 99-year leasehold or a freehold. You will probably still get S$3,000 in rental income.
The total rental yield is thus 3.1%, making it less attractive to a landlord.
This is one of the reasons landlords like to look for older leasehold properties, which may require lower capital to purchase but earn higher yields in return. You can browse for some of Singapore’s best-valued listings on 99.co.
The advantage of freehold is more theoretical than practical
When it comes to buying property as an investment, the difference between freehold and leasehold could be the equivalent of navel-gazing. It’s not a dispute that can be settled because (1) most of it is hypothetical, and (2) whatever you come up with, there are a thousand examples in the real world that will prove otherwise.
Let’s use the condo resale prices of condos in the CCR for the past 10 years. Looking at the graph below, the average price of freehold condos has generally been higher than their 99-year lease counterparts. This follows the theory that freehold condos are more expensive than leasehold condos.
But if we take a closer look at the average price psf of freehold and 99-year leasehold condos in the CCR, the theory doesn’t hold water. In 2012, 2014, and 2016, the average price psf of both types of condos were almost the same. In fact, the average price psf of 99-year lease condos was higher than those of the freehold condos in 2016.
Looking at the graph, it looks like we’ll also be looking at similar average price psf for these two types of condos this year.
An investor would do better to focus on the key principles. That is, what are the prices of surrounding properties? What amenities does the URA master plan suggest, and what do the transaction records show? These issues take precedence over whether a unit is a freehold or leasehold.
For homeowners looking at a long-term stay, don’t assume freehold is necessary. Family structures and places change. Family members migrate, children move out and you may want a change of scenery 20 years from now.
There are situations where home buyers opt for freehold, and then end up moving out after 40 years anyway, as the children have left and they want to downgrade. In such a situation, they could have saved considerably more for retirement with a leasehold property.
Would you buy a freehold or leasehold condo? Let us know in the comments section below!
If you found this article helpful, 99.co recommends Leasehold property in Singapore: What happens when the 99-year lease runs out? and The savvy case for buying a 99-year leasehold condo.
Looking for a property to buy or rent? Find your dream home on Singapore’s largest property portal 99.co! If you have an interesting property-related story to share with us, drop us a message here – we’ll review it and get back to you.
The post Freehold vs leasehold condos — Which is the better choice? appeared first on 99.co.